For all of what the DISCLOSE Act might do, does it seem to miss the “fix” the Supreme Court held in Citizens United: removing 441b’s ban on corporate independent expenditures from the books? As best as I can tell, it leaves 441b(a) untouched.
(In this September 2009 post I asked what 441b would look like if the Court threw out the law.)
The Committee on Rules will discuss H.R. 5175 on Thursday at 3 p.m.