DISCLOSE Act: A Citizens United “fix” or not so much?

For all of what the DISCLOSE Act might do, does it seem to miss the  “fix” the Supreme Court held in Citizens United:  removing 441b’s ban on corporate independent expenditures from the books?  As best as I can tell, it leaves 441b(a) untouched.

(In this September 2009 post I asked what 441b would look like if the Court threw out the law.)

The Committee on Rules will discuss H.R. 5175 on Thursday at 3 p.m.

Comments are closed.